knowledge and human interestsの例文

• Gr黱baum criticizes the hermeneutic interpretation of psychoanalysis propounded by J黵gen Habermas in " Knowledge and Human Interests " ( 1968 ).
• Habermas sees this in terms of psychoanalysis but does not expand on this in TCA . ( Habermas discusses psychoanalysis in Knowledge and Human Interests ( 1972 ))
• Philosopher Jonathan Lear criticizes RicS
  ur's work, blaming it, along with Habermas's " Knowledge and Human Interests ", for convincing some psychoanalysts that reasons cannot be causes, a view Lear considers part of a mistaken philosophical tradition.
• Through his translations he introduced Habermas's work ( " Toward a Rational Society " and " Knowledge and Human Interests " ) and Marcuse's early work ( " Negations " ) to the English-speaking world.
• This project started after the critical reception of Habermas's book " Knowledge and Human Interests " ( 1968 ), after which Habermas chose to move away from contextual and historical analysis of social knowledge toward what would become the theory of communicative action.
• To use an epistemological distinction introduced by J黵gen Habermas in " Erkenntnis und Interesse " [ 1968 ] ( " Knowledge and Human Interests " ), critical theory in literary studies is ultimately a form of hermeneutics; i . e ., knowledge via interpretation to understand the meaning of human texts and symbolic expressions including the interpretation of texts which themselves interpret other texts.
• He groups Brown's work with Marcuse's " Eros and Civilization ", Rieff's " Freud : The Mind of the Moralist ", Paul RicS
  ur's " Freud and Philosophy " ( 1965 ), and J黵gen Habermas's " Knowledge and Human Interests " ( 1968 ), arguing that they jointly placed Freud at the center of moral and philosophical inquiry.
• Philosopher Jeffrey Abramson compares " Freud and Philosophy " to Herbert Marcuse's " Eros and Civilization " ( 1955 ), Norman O . Brown's " Life Against Death " ( 1959 ), Philip Rieff's " Freud : The Mind of the Moralist " ( 1959 ) and Habermas's " Knowledge and Human Interests " ( 1968 ), arguing that they jointly placed Freud at the center of moral and philosophical inquiry.
• Philosopher Jeffrey Abramson compares " Eros and Civilization " to works such as Brown's " Life Against Death " ( 1959 ), Philip Rieff's " Freud : The Mind of the Moralist " ( 1959 ), Paul RicS
  ur's " Freud and Philosophy " ( 1965 ), and J黵gen Habermas's " Knowledge and Human Interests " ( 1968 ), arguing that they jointly placed Freud at the center of moral and philosophical inquiry.
• Philosopher Jeffrey Abramson compares " Freud : The Mind of the Moralist " to Herbert Marcuse's " Eros and Civilization " ( 1955 ), Norman O . Brown's " Life Against Death " ( 1959 ), Paul RicS
  ur's " Freud and Philosophy " ( 1965 ), and J黵gen Habermas's " Knowledge and Human Interests " ( 1968 ), arguing that they jointly placed Freud at the center of moral and philosophical inquiry.